Oppose Daniel Will's Supreme Court Nomination - Protect Our Constitutional Rights

Why Daniel Will Should Not Be Confirmed

The New Hampshire Executive Council is considering Daniel Will's nomination to the Supreme Court, but his record raises serious concerns about his commitment to protecting our constitutional rights.

The Constitutional Rights Crisis

Daniel Will, as State Solicitor General, was the architect of a dangerous legal theory that constitutional rights can be "suspended" during a State of Emergency. Court records show that Will argued:

• Governor Sununu could "temporarily suspend or limit fundamental rights" during emergencies
• Executives have "broad latitude to suspend civil liberties" during emergencies
• Constitutional rights don't apply as long as government actions are taken "in good faith" with "some factual basis"

Misleading the Executive Council

When questioned about these arguments during his confirmation hearing, Will repeatedly denied making these claims, despite clear court records proving otherwise. This raises serious questions about his honesty and integrity.

Pattern of Opposing Transparency

Will also argued to keep the "Laurie List" (police officers with credibility issues) secret from the public. The entire New Hampshire State Senate disagreed with his position in a 24-0 vote, showing his consistent pattern of putting state interests above public rights.

Our Supreme Court Must Protect Rights

The New Hampshire Supreme Court is our final defender of constitutional and civil rights. We cannot afford to place someone on the court who has argued that these rights can be suspended whenever the government claims "good faith."

Take Action Now

Contact your Executive Councilor today and urge them to vote against Daniel Will's confirmation. Our constitutional rights depend on having judges who will protect them, not suspend them.

The stakes are too high to remain silent. Add your name and we'll help you contact your Executive Councilor.